The
ancient STATE
of
ENGLAND.
Having thus given our young readers a
transient idea of the present state of South-Britain; we shall now
proceed to give a succinct account of the ancient state of England,
which, in regard to its constitution, was originally a monarchy, under
the primitive Britons; after that, a province, subordinate to the
Romans; then an heptarchical government under the Saxons; then again a
kingdom in subjection to the Danes; next after them, under the power
and dominion of the Normans; but at present, (after all the
before-mentioned revolutions,) a monarchy again under the English; of
all which we shall treat, as briefly as possible, in their proper order.
The whole island was anciently called Albion, which seems to have been
softened from the word Alpion; because the word Alp, in some of the
original western languages, generally signifies high lands, or hills,
as this isle appears to those who approach it from the Continent.
It was likewise called Olbion,
(67)
which, in the Greek language, signifies happy; but of those times there
is no certainty in history, more than that it had the denomination, and
was very little known by the rest of the world.
[Wikipedia states that the name is
perhaps of Celtic origin or older, associating it with the
Proto-Indo-European root meaning both "white" and "mountain".]
As the name of Britain, however, excepting that of Albion, or Olbion,
just before mentioned, has been liable to as many derivations as the
origin of the Britons; we shall content ourselves (for brevity's sake)
with the following extract from Camden, who has given (in our humble
opinion at least) the best and most natural derivation of the term.
"The ancient Britons (says he) painted their naked bodies and small
shields with woad of an azure-blue colour, which by them was called
Brith; on this account the inhabitants received the common appellation
from the strangers who came into the island to traffic from the coasts
of Gaul, or Germany; to which the Greeks, by adding the word tania, or
country, formed the word Britannia, or the country of the painted men,
and the Romans afterwards called it Britannia."
Here it may be observed, that the Romans were extremely fond of giving
their own terminations to many uncivilized countries, and of forming
easy and pleasant sounds out of the harshest and most offensive, to
such elegant tongues and ears as their own.
[Wikipedia states that Britannia is
from the P-Celtic name for the Picts (the "painted people"): Prydyn.]
(68)
Their GOVERNMENT.
Their government, like that of the ancient Gauls, consisted of several
small nations, under divers petty Princes, apparently the original
governments of the world, deduced from the natural force and right of
paternal dominion; such were the hords
[sic] among the Goths, the clans
in Scotland, and the septs in Ireland: but whether these small British
principalities descended by succession, or were elected according to
merit, is uncertain.
Their language and customs were, for the most part, the same with those
of the Gauls before the Roman conquests in that province; but they were
entirely governed in their religion and laws by their Druids, Bards,
and Eubates.
Their Druids were held in such high veneration by the people, that
their authority was almost absolute. No public affairs were
transacted without their approbation; nor could any malefactor (though
his crimes were ever so heinous) be put to death without their consent.
Their Bardi, or Bards, were priests of an inferior order of their
Druids; their principal business being to celebrate the praises of
their heroes in verses and songs, which were set to music and sung to
their harps.
(69)
Their Eubates were a third sort of priests, who applied themselves to
the study of philosophy.
Each order of these priests led very simple and innocent lives, and
resided either in woods, caverns, or hollow trees. Their food
consisted of acorns, berries, or other mast
[the freedictionary defines this as
"the nuts of forest trees accumulated on the ground"]; and their
drink was nothing but water. By this abstemious course of life,
however, they procured an universal esteem, not only for their superior
knowledge, but their generous contempt of all those enjoyments of life
which all others so highly valued, and so industriously pursued.
The
most remarkable TENETS
of
their DRUIDS.
1. Every thing derives its
origin from heaven.
2. Great care is to be taken in the education of children.
3. Souls are immortal.
4. The souls of men after death go into other bodies.
5. If ever the world should happen to be destroyed, it will
be either by fire or water.
6. All commerce with strangers should be prohibited.
7. He who comes last to the Assembly of the states ought to
be punished with death
[strong
motivation for punctuality!].
8. Children should be brought up apart from their parents,
till they are fourteen years of age.
(70)
9. There is another world; and they who kill
themselves to accompany their friends thither will live with them there.
10. All masters of families are kings in their own houses; and
have a power of life and death over their wives, children, and
slaves.
Their
ANCIENT STATES.
STATES.
|
COUNTIES.
|
1. Danmonii,
|
Cornwall
and Devon.
|
2. Durotriges,
|
Dorset.
|
3. Belgæ,
|
Somerset,
Wilts, and the
north part of Hants.
|
4. Attrebatii,
|
Berks.
|
5. Regni,
|
Surrey,
Sussex, and the south
part of Hants.
|
6. Cantii,
|
Kent.
|
7. Trinobantes,
|
Middlesex,
Hertfordshire, &
Essex.
|
8. Iceni,
|
Suffolk,
Norfolk, Cambridge,
and Huntingdon.
|
9. Catieuchlani,
|
Bucks
and Bedford.
|
10. Dobuni,
|
Gloucester
and Oxford.
|
11. Silures,
|
Hereford,
Monmouth, Rad-
nor, Brecon, & Glamorgan.
|
12. Dimetæ,
|
Carmarthen,
Pembroke, and
Cardigan.
|
(71)
STATES.
|
COUNTIES.
|
13. Ordovices,
|
Flint,
Denbigh, Merioneth,
Montgomery, & Carnarvon.
|
14.
Cornavii,
|
Chester,
Salop, Stafford,
Warwick, and Worcester.
|
15.
Coritani,
|
Lincoln,
Nottingham, Derby,
Leicester, Rutland, and
Northampton.
|
16.
Brigantes,
|
York,
Lancaster, Westmore-
land, Cumberland, &
Durham.
|
17.
Ottadini,
|
Northumberland.
|
Their general CHARACTER.
They were a great and glorious people,
fond of liberty and property; but peculiarly remarkable for their rigid
virtue, and their readiness to die with pleasure for the good of their
country. They long lived in a perfect state of peace and
tranquility till the year of the world 3950
[counting from 4004 BC], at
which time its
monarchy, by the boundless envy and ambition of Julius Cæsar,
(when
Rome was in the meridian of all her glory) was totally subverted, and
Britannia became a province subordinatte
[sic] to the Romans.
The
ROMAN GOVERNMENT.
Cæsar, at his first landing on the island, found it not under a
sole
monarchy, but divided into divers provinces, or petty kingdoms.
Soon after having defeated Cassibelan
[various spellings: Wikipedia has
Cassivellaunus; in the Mabinogion his name is spelled as Caswallawn],
and taken several British provinces, he left the
(72)
island, and the Romans entirely abandoned it for ninety years and
upwards.
However, in the year of our Lord 42, Claudius Cæsar, the 5th
Emperor of Rome, sent his General Plautius, with great force, into
Britain, and following him soon after in person, subdued a great part
of the island, by which means he procured the title of Britannicus.
In the year 50, London is supposed to have been built by the Romans.
In this year Ostorius, the Roman general, defeated Caractacus
[Caradoc, Caradawg, etc.], the
chief of the British Princes, and having taken him prisoner, carried
him to Rome.
The Christian religion, about this time, was first planted in Britain.
In the year 61, the Britons, under the conduct
[leadership] of Boadicea
[Boudica, Boudicca], a British
Queen, destroyed 70,000 Romans.
The next year Suetonius, the Roman general, defeated the Britons, and
killed 80,000 of them upon the spot; whereupon Boadicea poisoned
herself.
In the year 63, the gospel was first preached in Britain by Joseph of
Arimathea, and eleven of St. Philip's disciples.
The
PERSECUTIONS against the
CHRISTIANS
consequent thereupon.
1. First persecution was begun by Nero, soon after
he had burnt the city of Rome, which was in the year 65.
(73)
2. The second, by Flavius Domitian, in the year 83.
3. The third, by Ulpius Trajan, in the year 111.
4. In the year 162, the fourth was raised by Marcus
Aurelius Antoninus, and his associate Lucius Verus.
5. The fifth was begun by Septimus Severus, in the year 193.
6. In 235, the sixth was raised by Maximinus.
7. Trajanus began the seventh in the year 253.
8. In 255, the eighth was raised by Valerianus.
9. Valerianus Aurelianus began the ninth in the year
272. And
10. Dioclesian
[should be
Diocletian] and Maximianus carried on the tenth with the utmost
severity.
After the Romans, however, had been in the possession of Britain for
near 500 years, they left it to its ancient inhabitants again, who
being at that time sunk into the lowest state of degeneracy, were soon
after invaded by the Scots and the Picts; and trembling at the
approaching storm, they were prevailed on by Vortigern, their chief
monarch, about the year 447, to send a deputation to the Saxons, who
were the only persons (as he insinuated) capable of giving them that
aid and assistance which the unhappy situation of their affairs
immediately required. This plausible pretence of that Prince
succeeded, and one and all concurred in his opinion; and by the
resolution which they then took thereupon, they
(74)
brought on the total destruction of their country.
Ambassadors from the Britons were accordingly sent to Witigisel
[more commonly Wihtgisl], the
then Saxon general, who immediately summoned an assembly to hear what
the Britons had to propose. The latter (like men in absolute
despair) offered to submit to any terms that their said assembly should
think proper, provided they did but protect and stand by them so far in
their pressing necessities, as to enable them to drive their enemies
out of their country. The proposal was approved of, and the
negociation
[sic]
accordingly concluded.
The terms were, that the Saxons should send 9000 men into Britain, who
were to be put into possession of the Isle of Thanet, and to be paid
and maintained likewise at the expence
[sic] of the Britons.
Hengist and Horsa, both sons of the Saxon General Witigisel, who were
brave and resolute men, fit for, and fond of such an expedition, were
appointed, in the year 450, to command the Saxon troops intended for
the relief of Britain.
Tho' these two heroes arrived at Ebbesfleet, in the island of Thanet,
with 1500 men only, instead of 9000, yet they were received with the
utmost respect by Vortigern, who put them immediately, according to
promise, in full possession of that island.
As the Picts and Scots, at that time, were advancing their forces
against the Britons,
(75)
Hengist joined Vortigern, and inspiring the British troops with new
courage, a battle was fought near Stamford, in Lincolnshire, wherein
the Picts and Scots were so absolutely defeated, that they were obliged
to abandon their conquests, and retire into their own country.
Hengist had a beautiful daughter, named Rowena, with whom Vortigern
fell deeply in love, and demanded her in marriage of her father, who,
ever attentive to enlarge his dominions, refused his consent, unless
the amorous Briton would put him in possession of the whole county of
Kent. The terms were readily accepted, and the match
concluded. In short, this love-sick passion, this seemingly
trivial circumstance, occasioned the greatest revolution that had ever
been felt in Britain.
The
SAXON HEPTARCHY.
We shall now take a transient view of
the Saxon Heptarchy, consequent thereupon.
I. The
Kingdom of Kent.
The first was the kingdom of Kent, founded by Hengist, in 453, and
contained only that county; being inhabited by the Jutes. It
continued 368 years, and ended in 823, having been governed by ten of
its own Kings, and seven doubtful or foreign Princes; of whom four were
Pagans and three Christians. Its principal places were
Canterbury, Dover, Rochester, Sandwich, Deal, Folkstone, and Reculver.
(76)
II.
The Kingdom of the South Saxons.
The second was the kingdom of the South
Saxons, founded by Ella in 491, and contained the counties of Sussex
and Surrey, whose principal city was Chichester. It continued
about 109 years, and ended about the year 600; having only five
monarchs, of whom two were Pagans, and three Christians: it was mostly
under the power of the Kings of Kent, and the West Saxons.
III. The
Kingdom of the West Saxons.
The third was the
kingdom of the West Saxons, founded by Cerdic in 419;
and contained Cornwall, Devonshire, Dorsetshire, Wiltshire,
Somersetshire, and Hampshire, with the Isle of Wight and Berkshire,
though the remains of the Britons likewise inhabited Cornwall: the
principal places were Winchester, Southampton, Portsmouth, Salisbury,
Dorchester, Sherborne, and Exeter: it continued till the Norman
Conquest, being 547 years, and ended in 1066, having been governed by
17 monarchs, during the heptarchy, of whom five were Pagans, and 12
Christians: the last of whom was Egbert, who, in 829, became sole
monarch of England.
IV. The
Kingdom of the East Saxons.
The fourth was the kingdom of the East Saxons, and contained
Middlesex, Essex, and
(77)
part of Hertforshire; where the principal places were London and
Colchester: it was founded in 527, by Erkenwin, and continued 220
years, ending in 747; having been governed by 12 monarchs, of whom two
were Pagans, and the rest Christians.
V.
The Kingdom of Northumberland.
The fifth was the kingdom of
Northumberland, founded by Ina, in 547, and contained Lancashire,
Yorkshire, Durham, Cumberland, Westmoreland, Northumberland, and part
of Scotland, as far as Edinburgh Frith
[Forth]: the principal places
being York, Durham, Carlisle, Hexham, and Lancaster: it continued 245
years, and ended in 792; having been governed by 20 Princes, of whom
four were Pagans, and the rest Christians, whose subjects were Angles,
and called the Northumbrian Angles.
VI. The
Kingdom of the East Angles.
The sixth was the kingdom of the East Angles, which contained Norfolk,
Suffolk, and Cambridgeshire, with the Isle of Ely; where the principal
places were Norwich, Thetford, Ely, and Cambridge. It was founded
by Uffa in 575, and continued 218 years, ending in 792, when it was
united to the kingdom of the Mercians.
(78)
VII. The
Kingdom of the Mercians.
The seventh and last was the kingdom of the Mercians, or the Middle
Angles, founded by Cridda in 582; and contained Gloucestershire,
Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Warwickshire, Leicestershire,
Rutlandshire, Northamptonshire, Lincolnshire, Huntingdonshire,
Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, part of Berkshire, Oxfordshire,
Staffordshire, Shropshire, Nottinghamshire, and Cheshire; the
principal places being Lincoln, Nottingham, Warwick, Leicester,
Coventry, Litchfield, Northampton, Worcester, Gloucester, Derby
[pronounced Darby], Chester,
Shrewsbury, Stafford, Oxford, and Bristol: it continued 292 years, and
ended in 874; having been governed by 18 monarchs, of whom four were
Pagans, and the rest Christians.
Egbert
the Great, first King of England.
In the year 829, Egbert, the 17th King of the West Saxons, became sole
monarch of all the seven kingdoms, and was crowned at Winchester, in
Hampshire, by the unanimous consent both of the clergy and laity, King
of England; and immediately afterwards a proclamation was
published, whereby it was ordered, that no future distinctions should
be kept up among the Saxon kingdoms; but that they should all pass
under the common name of England.
(79)
Though Egbert was a wise and fortunate Prince, and though the English
were a brave and numerous people, after the expulsion of the Picts and
Scots; yet no sooner was he well established on the throne, but this
island was exposed to new invasions.
In 832, the Danes, having made two descents before, landed a third time
with great force at the Isle of Sheppey, in Kent; and in some few
months afterwards at Charmouth, in Dorsetshire, with 18,000 men.
In 835, they landed again in Cornwall; but Egbert was then prepared for
them, and gave them a total defeat. They renewed their
depredations, however, in 836, but were again repulsed. Soon
after which, this Prince having reigned King of the West Saxons 36
years, and sole monarch of England upwards of eight, died as great as
he lived, and was buried at Winchester, where he was crowned. He
was the father, in short, of the English monarchy, and therefore justly
entitled to the name of Egbert the Great.
Ethelwulf,
the Second King of England.
Ethelwulf, the elder surviving son of Egbert, succeeded his father in
836. Till he became a King, he had been only a priest, or, at
most, only bishop of Winchester. He obtained, however, a
dispensation from Pope Gregory IV. and assumed a secular life.
(80)
In the first year of his reign, the Danes landed at Southampton, in
Hampshire, but were routed with great slaughter. In 837, however,
they made a second descent upon Portland, in Dorsetshire, and succeeded
in their attempt.
In 838, they made another descent about Romney, in Kent, with such
success, and great slaughter, that they over-ran the country.
In short, they made fresh visits for several years afterwards
successively, for the sake of plunder only, without the least intention
of making a settlement in the kingdom.
Ethelwulf, however, in 852, assembled a numerous army, with the
assistance of his brother Athelstan, met them at Okely, in Surry
[sic]; and there, after a
desperate engagement, proved so victorious, that the slaughter of their
enemies was almost incredible.
In 855, Ethelwulf went to Rome, in order to pay a visit to the Pope in
person; and, on receiving his benediction, he not only gratified the
vanity of the papal see by his devotion, but satisfied likewise its
most avaricious expectations by his royal bounty.
In 857, after having reigned one and twenty years, he divided his
kingdom between his two eldest sons, Ethelbald and Ethelbert, and soon
after died, and was buried at Winchester.
III.
[sic] Ethelbald and Ethelbert, joint Kings of
England.
Ethelbald, whose reign was but short,
and no ways remarkable, died in 800, and was buried at Sherborne, in
Dorsetshire.
(81)
Ethelbert,
the fourth King of England.
Though Ethelbert bore an excellent character, yet he was no favourite
of fortune; for from his coronation in 860, to his death in 866,
he had one continued conflict with the Danes. He was interred at
Sherborne, near his brother.
Ethelred,
the fifth King of England.
In 866, Ethelred, third son of Ethelwulf, succeeded to the crown: in
whose reign the Danes committed great ravages through the kingdom.
Notwithstanding, in 868, a great famine and plague happened in England,
yet those merciless and blood-thirsty Pagans the Danes, in 869, through
their aversion to Christianity, set fire to the religious houses in the
city of York, murdered the monks, ravished the nuns, and made a
sacrifice of Edmund, titular King of the East Angles, by first shooting
his body full of arrows, and afterwards cutting off his head. He
was soon after interred at St. Edmundsbury, in the county of Suffolk,
from whom it has ever since been distinguished by that name, as the
manner of that Prince's death entitled him to the honour of martyrdom.
Ethelred, after having reigned six years, was buried at Winbourn, in
the county of Dorset.
Alfred
the Great, sixth King of England.
In the year 872, Alfred the Great (the fourth son of Ethelwulf)
succeeded his brother
(82)
Ethelred, whose moral virtues endeared him so far to his subjects, that
they honoured him with the appellation of the Father of the English
Constitution
[Alfred, presumably,
not Ethelred]. He was crowned at Winchester.
In the year 878, the Danes settled themselves in divers parts of
England, with whom Alfred fought many battles, with various success;
but at length gave them a total overthrow at Eddington, in
Somersetshire, and not only obliged their leader Guthrun
[usually written Guthrum], the
chiefs of
their army, and the main body of their people, to be baptized, but
afterwards to retire out of the kingdom.
This illustrious Prince, in 882, rebuilt the city of London, which had
been burnt and destroyed by the Danes in 839.
As he was an excellent scholar himself, he founded, or at least greatly
augmented, the University of Oxford.
In 893, the Danes, with 300 ships, under one Hastings
[usually written Haesten],
invaded England
again, but were defeated by Alfred's army, at Farnham, Surry
[sic].
In 897, a plague happened, and raged throughout the land for three
years successively.
In the year 900, Alfred died of a contraction of the nerves,
after he had lived 51 years, and reigned 29.
Edward
the Elder, seventh King of England.
On his decease, Edward the Elder (so called to distinguish him from
Edward the Martyr, and Edward the Confessor) succeeded his father, and
was crowned at Kingston upon Thames.
(83)
This Prince was a brave warrior, and tho' invaded by the Danes, in the
year 905, he defeated them in Kent.
In the year 911, he improved the University of Cambridge, much after
the same manner as Alfred his father had augmented Oxford.
In 921, he was in the height of his glory, all the Princes in Britain
either submitting to his allegiance, or courting his favour.
He died in the 24th year of his reign, at Farringdon, in Berkshire, and
was buried at Winchester.
Tho' he had three wives, and several children, yet Ethelstan, his son
by one Egwinna, a shepherd's daughter, succeeded to his kingdom.
Ethelstan,
eighth King of England.
He was crowned in the 13th year of his age, at Kingston upon Thames, in
the year 924.
In the year, 938, he defeated both the Danes and Scots, and made the
Princes of Wales pay him a tribute of 20 pounds of gold, 300 pounds of
silver, and 25,000 head of cattle.
The same year he caused the Bible to be translated into the Saxon,
which was then the mother tongue.
Much about this time the renowned Guy, Earl of Warwick, is said to have
encountered Colebrand
[the more
common spelling is Colbrand; apparently Guy of Warwick never existed,
but his legend was very popular in England and France between the 13th
and 17th centuries] , the famous Danish giant, and, after a
sharp contest, to have killed him on the spot at Winchester.